Bill Nye to Climate Change Deniers: You Can’t Ignore Facts Forever


You’ve heard the President in drought-stricken
California saying that these weather emergencies in effect, are creating the conditions that
the government has to act. David, I think that what it brings to mind
is how we utilize the information that we have, and we all know. And I think that Bill
would probably agree with this; neither he nor I are a climate scientist. He is an engineer
and an actor, I am a member of Congress, and what we have to do is look at the information
that we get from climate scientists. As you said… So she did something, which is very common
in the climate denier community or whatever you would call it, is to talk about credentials.
So, Marsha Blackburn, Representative in the US Congress from Tennessee said well I am
a congresswoman and Bill you’re just a mechanical engineer so you’re not really a climate scientist.
And what I would say is what we’re talking about in this level of climate science is
you don’t need to be a full-time climate scientists to understand it. Furthermore, as far as my
credentials everybody, I’m a mechanical engineer. I took a lot of physics. All I did was take
physics, physics, physics, physics. And when you’re done with formal physics then you take
mechanical engineering, which is just applied physics. I get it. I can understand what’s
going on. We’re putting carbon dioxide in the air at a prodigious rate and the world
is getting warmer and you can know this by looking at the neutrons in the ice. You can
know this by looking at the pollen grains per cubic centimeter in the sediment of ponds.
You can know this by looking carefully at the rings on trees during warm seasons, wet
seasons, cold seasons, dry seasons, and you can work your way back and figure out that
the earth is getting warmer faster than has ever gotten before. And that’s the problem. It’s not that the
world hasn’t had more carbon dioxide, it’s not the world hasn’t been warmer. The problem
is the speed at which things are changing. We are inducing a sixth mass extinction event
kind of by accident and we don’t want to be the extinctee, if I may coin this noun. So,
I mean as far as Miss Blackburn, sounded like she had been coached on denial bullet points
or talking points. And I very much enjoy taking those people on, but meanwhile it breaks my
heart because we got work to do. And the fossil fuel industry has really gotten in their ears
and it’s really troublesome. We’re the world’s most technically advanced country, or if the
U.S. isn’t the most technically advanced it’s certainly in the top ten. I mean you could
say Japan, New Zealand are very sophisticated societies. But the U.S. is where iPhone’s
are invented, what have you, the Internet; it’s still a significant place. And so to
have a generation of science students being brought up without awareness of climate change
is just a formula for disaster. I mean this is, everybody kinda knows this. So, I think, as an observer, and I may be
wrong as I like to say, you may be right, as an observer it looks like the U.S.’s strength
is its weakness. So people came here from all over the world for freedom to think and
act the way they wanted, especially freedom of religion. So, we ended up with both the
people who framed the Constitution, which is a fabulous thing, and people who asserted
that the garden of Eden was in Missouri. And there’s no police for that sort of thing.
You’re allowed to believe whatever you want. It’s great. But with that was this, for them,
and I emphasize them, the other side, consequence of that was you could also ignore facts of
science for a while and now it’s coming to a head. But man it’s really divisive, isn’t
it? It’s really something. That living things change from generation
to generation through a process that Darwin and Wallace, Alfred Wallace called natural
selection or descent with modification. Those are true things. Those are facts. Tectonic
plates move and that’s a fact and the world is getting warmer because of human activity.
That’s a fact. If you had somebody who really strongly believed the earth was flat, you
wouldn’t have to have that person on a television show with the people who believe the earth
is round. So, the BBC as I understand just got enough. We got work to do. It’s not one
person versus the other person, it’s 97 people versus three people. After a while let’s move
on. There may have been such debates at sometime in early human history, but you wouldn’t have
such a debate now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *